Gen. McPeak comments he made in the LA Times

There really is nothing Obama won't do or people he'll bring out.  He now has resorted to recycling his advisers. It doesn't make much sense for Bill to mention Obama's name while campaign for Hillary now does it.
March 22, 2008
Categories: Bill Clinton

More outrage: Bill Clinton and Gen. McPeak

Retired Air Force Gen. Merrill McPeak, an Obama surrogate, responded to Bill Clinton's Friday remarks -- where some took Clinton to be commenting on Obama's patriotism by saying a Hillary-McCain match up would be between "two people who love this country" -- by launching a new salvo in the umbrage war.

"I grew up, I was going to college when Joe McCarthy was accusing good Americans of being traitors, so I've had enough of it," McPeak said yesterday, according to the AP.

The Clinton campaign brought up McPeak in a conference call today. Clinton spokesman Phil Singer told reporters "to ask why the Obama campaign brings Gen. McPeak out on the campaign trail."

Gen. McPeak got in a bit of trouble about six weeks ago when he told the Los Angeles Times that Obama "doesn't go on television and have crying fits; he isn't discovering his voice at the age of 60."

Singer tried to also frame McPeak's presence as a strike against Obama's national security experience, saying that after the February comments, "the Obama campaign then proceeded to keep Gen. McPeak off the campaign trail until voters made their doubts about Barack Obama's readiness to be commander in chief known."

The AP reported that McPeak, when asked today about the McCarthy line, joked, "occasionally I say something a little earthier."

The Obama campaign sent out a mass e-mail earlier this afternoon highlighting an exchange from a 1992 debate between Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush where Clinton said, "Your father was right to stand up to Joe McCarthy. You were wrong to attack my patriotism. I was opposed to the war but I love my country and we need a president who will bring this country together, not divide it."



Display:


Re: Gen. McPeak comments he made in the LA Times (2.00 / 1)

I have met McPeak on several occasions. I found him to be a very bright and unusually direct person for someone who is a retired Air Force Chief of Staff.

I understand why you might find his earlier comments offensive, but that doesn't mean that his current comments are not right on the mark.

I do not know for certain what BC intended to express, but I sure know what it sounded like.  It sounded like a veiled attack on Obama's patriotism.  For a former Dem President to even imply such a thing about the front-runner for the party's nomination is clearly out of bounds and deserved to be slapped down hard.

The Clintons are very crafty in attacking their opponents.  They often reserve a certain "plausible deniability" that means they can claim innocence if they get called for implying something highly negative.  You are never quite sure if they meant the attack or not, but if you watch the pattern of such attacks you can't help but believe that they know exactly what they are doing.  It is a clever but dirty tactic.


by upper left on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 12:44:33 AM EST

"plausible deniability" has a flip side (none / 0)

which would be something like "paranoid projection."


by sgary on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 01:18:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gen. McPeak comments he made in the LA Times (none / 0)

It is a clever but dirty tactic.

Yeah, and pretending to know what someone "really" meant when the text clearly supports an alternative, purely benign explanation, is a clever but far dirtier trick.


by frankly0 on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 01:02:57 AM EST

Re: Gen. McPeak comments he made in the LA Times (none / 0)

frankly,

Did you even bother to read my comment?

Did I not say, "I do not know for certain what BC intended to express, but I sure know what it sounded like.  It sounded like a veiled attack on Obama's patriotism.  For a former Dem President to even imply such a thing about the front-runner for the party's nomination is clearly out of bounds and deserved to be slapped down hard.

The Clintons are very crafty in attacking their opponents.  They often reserve a certain "plausible deniability" that means they can claim innocence if they get called for implying something highly negative.  You are never quite sure if they meant the attack or not."

I specifically did not say I know what Clinton meant.

More of your usual obnoxiousness and belligerence.


by upper left on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 06:36:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Alegre already posted a diary like this. (2.00 / 0)

Suffice to say, yes, Clinton meant it as a swipe against Obama. No you didn't include the full quote.  Yes, it actually matters.

Thank you for posting the bit about the Bush Sr./Bill Clinton exchange.  That was pretty cool.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 01:55:57 AM EST

Re: Gen. McPeak comments he made in the LA Times (none / 0)

The full text:
"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country," said Clinton, who was speaking to a group of veterans Friday in Charlotte, N.C. "And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

I personally believe he was talking about the primary election that is currently going on so the two candidates could talk about ISSUES and the differences in their ISSUES which would help the PARTY in the general election against McCain rather divide the party with remarks like McPeak who interject that the innocuous statement was calling Obama a communist. This has gone beyond ridiculous.

When Biden called Obama articulate it was a veiled insult that blacks aren't articulate. It was a compliment thrown back into the guys face as a racist remark. Not all white people are articulate and being called articulate by anyone is a compliment.


by Justwords on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 05:15:47 AM EST

Re: Gen. McPeak comments he made in the LA Times (none / 0)

It was an Obama camp slime...


by jbohio on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 08:33:19 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.