One-degree of separation: Obama and the "Illinois Combine"

Saturday, March 22, 2008
One-degree of separation: Obama and the "Illinois Combine"

In his Easter Sunday, March 23, 2008, column, the Chicago Tribune's John Kass http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opini on/chi-kass_bdmar23,1,3926553.columnclea r insight into the Chicago machine being exposed through the federal fraud trial of indicted political fixer Antoin "Tony" Rezko. Kass began thusly:
    All week, Stuart Levine, the Republican snitch who loves his gladiator movies, has been telling the story of Illinois.
    He tells it from the witness stand in federal court, weaving the tale of this political boss and that political boss, that Democrat, this Republican, all working together for the common good.
    He means, the good stuff in their wallets. Kass asked "what do we call this relationship, again? This Illinois custom of quiet sharing of power across party lines for the benefit of a fat connected few?

"What is it? What is it, again?"

Stating that Levine's testimony is "putting things together for the prosecution", Kass remarked "That's the narrow focus. ... Actually, he's telling a larger tale, about power and clout in our state."

Kass turned to former Illinois U.S. Sen. Peter Fitzgerald for wisdom:

   "What do you call that Illinois political class that's not committed to any party, they simply want to make money off the taxpayers?" Fitzgerald said. "You know what to call them."

   What?

   "The Illinois Combine," Fitzgerald said. "The bipartisan Illinois political combine. And all these guys being mentioned, they're part of it."

And who are "these guys being mentioned"?, RezkoWatch asks.

Well, quite simply put, most of them have been connected in one way or the other with 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama dating to at least 1995 when he ran for the Illinois State Senate. They have been--and some still are--colleagues, campaign contributors, and fellow travelers along Obama's meteoric rise in both Illinois and national politics, a veritable "who's who" of the "Illinois Combine".

Many of their names have appeared in indictments and on witness lists connected with Rezko's trial. Others, like Iraqi-British billionaire businessman and former Rezko partner, Nadhmi Auchi, are found in court documents. Although accused of no crimes, these names consistently reappear connected with that of Rezko--and Obama. Other names are yet destined to appear in future legal proceedings against Rezko.

Keep in mind what Dan Morain wrote in the September 8, 2007, Los Angeles Times:

   "Now, promoting himself as a fresh face on the national political stage, proclaiming his distance from lobbyists and the Washington culture of special interests, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has to contend with his own history. ... From Chicago to Springfield, his past is filled with decidedly old-school political tactics -- a history of befriending powerful local elders, assisting benefactors and special interests, and neutralizing rivals."

Oh, yes, and did we mention, Obama's name also appears on the witness list for the current trial, making his one more in what former Illinois U.S. Sen. Peter Fitzgerald called the "Illinois Combine".



Display:


Re: One-degree of separation: (2.00 / 0)

Except that there is no evidence of any corrupt acts by Obama.

At best, the Rezko/house thing was poor judgment, but no illegality has ever been identified.

The record to date suggests that Obama was able to retain his personal honesty in the swamp of Illinois politics.

I wish the Obama and Clinton people would fight about the furture of America and issues.

The economy is going to hell.  What would they do?


by TomP on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 02:30:17 PM EST

Re: One-degree of separation: (none / 0)

Are you following the Rezko trial?

Listened to, or read the transcripts of the tapes?

Also, isn't this how Washington, DC, works, too?

And doesn't that concern anyone, or is everybody hoping for a ride on the gravy train?

Stuart Levine is quoted as saying Rezko had full control of the "central apparatus," ie the governor's office.

Imagine someone like Rezko controlling the Presidency.


by Marsha1 on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 03:57:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Evidence of corruption please (2.00 / 1)

But Obama claimed to be above all of that. That's the problem. So naming criminals of "politics as usual" politicians won't help him.


by HillaryKnight08 on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 02:47:06 PM EST

Re: Evidence of corruption please (none / 0)

Are you seriously saying because he promised NOT to participate in "politics as usual", and apparently he decided to anyway, anything Hillary does is okay?


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 02:59:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Evidence of corruption please (2.00 / 1)

No, that's not what I'm saying. Obama has raised expectations of himself, therefore, pointing out that Hillary did a similar thing won't help him. Also, because of these higher expectations, wrongdoing will hurt him more than Hillary. That's all I'm saying.


by HillaryKnight08 on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 03:04:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Evidence of corruption please (none / 0)

Hrm.

I guess I gotta give that one to ya.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 03:39:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Claimed to be above all what? (none / 0)

I hope this helps:

# I certainly didn't expect to find myself in this position a year ago. I've been struck by how hungry we all are for a different kind of politics. So I've spent some time thinking about how I could best advance the cause of change and progress that we so desperately need...The decisions that have been made in Washington these past six years, and the problems that have been ignored, have put our country in a precarious place. America's faced big problems before. But today, our leaders in Washington seem incapable of working together in a practical, commonsense way. Politics has become so bitter and partisan, so gummed up by money and influence, that we can't tackle the big problems that demand solutions

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Barack_Obam a


by HillaryKnight08 on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 03:06:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Well that doesn't (none / 0)

appear to reference having donors who turn out to be crooks at all. In fact, it seems to be referring to something different altogether.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 04:33:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: One-degree of separation: Obama and the (none / 0)

See, that's very clever what you did there... you took the Kass article, that does not mentions Obama at all and talks mostly about a couple of corrupt Republicans (and a former republican senator who tried to fight such corruption) and you turn it against Obama based on some rezkowatch voodoo.

Your hackery is disingenuous, desperate and filthy at best. Next time try harder.

Next.


_____________
changiness
by lizardbox on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 03:02:56 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.